A few weeks back, I took a look at the State of Detroit Tiger fandom, and, after catching an interesting show on MLB Network over the weekend, I thought perhaps I would touch on the State of Baseball. The show featured Tony LaRussa, Bob Costas, Harold Reynolds and a couple baseball writers giving their opinions about items ranging from PEDs to the fact that it was “unfair” our Tigers had an “advantage” by securing a playoff spot via a division championship with the seventh best record in the American League in 2012, while the Texas Rangers (who won 93 games–five more than Detroit) were eliminated in a one-game Wildcard Playoff. Yep–they went there.
This week I will look at some of the issues covered in that program. Today, we’ll start by looking at something that was rather divisive a year ago–the expansion of the postseason.
Sadly this new format is now set in stone. I am not a fan of the one-game, win or you go home scenario in the Wildcard Playoff. It is not how baseball usually decides matters in the postseason. Certainly we have seen plenty of 163rd game scenarios (we Tigers’ fans excruciatingly remember 2009′s version of this game). Those games are no doubt exciting–but it is technically an extra regular season game to decide who gets into the postseason. To have two wildcard teams playing each other in a one-game playoff screams NFL playoffs or NCAA tournament, not baseball.
Furthermore, baseball is also the only sport that clusters its regular season games into a series. Those series offer a unique beauty to the sport. Whether it is the regular season or playoffs, a team can have a horrendous showing in one of the games, but can have redemption in the other games. The new first round robs teams of that.
So what’s the solution? A best-of-three scenario? This would push the playoffs even further into the cold abyss of late October/early November. By doing a possible three-game series, spread out over three to four days (if an off-day for travel is scheduled), it would mean the rest of the playoff teams are waiting around nearly a week to play a meaningful game. October is not a good time for multiple off days, as the Tigers found out in both 2006 and 2012.
With no good solution, leaving the format alone would have been preferable. Alas, that ship has sailed and the new format is here to stay–especially with the tremendous ratings the wildcard games garnered in 2012. Think high television ratings equate to a great idea? American Idol and Dancing With The Stars each score high ratings, but its rare when someone describes either as quality television.
The current playoff system was rammed through last season when the leagues were still not balanced and the 2012 playoff docket had already been set. This caused the Divisional Series to be moved to a 2-3 format, giving the higher seed the disadvantage of playing the first two games on the road (though that did benefit the Tigers), instead of the traditional 2-2-1 format. The familiar format will return this October, but what was the hurry for baseball to change the playoff format when the sport was not customized for it yet? One word: money.
The powers that be knew that the games would be ratings bonanzas. They also knew that often times, the darlings of baseball–the Yankees–were knocked off by wildcard teams–thus implying the wildcard team should not have the same advantages of a divisional champion (even though the higher seed always has more home games). From 1995 to 2011, under the old playoff format, 10 out of 34 wildcard teams reached the World Series. That’s hardly a tremendous success rate–but MLB apparently thought that wildcard teams were winning too much.
Had the 2012 postseason format been in effect for the 2011 season, perhaps the greatest day in regular season baseball history–the final game of the 2011 season–would never have happened because those teams battling would have known they could live to fight another day.
Is the expansion of the playoffs a good thing for the game or just another way to make some money and protect the marquee teams of the sport?