Baseball is a game of numbers. We revel in them as fans. We use them to compare the greats of the game against each other, even when history can’t be compared to the present because of changes to the game. We use numbers to determine how many wins a player is going to give a team. Fans, teams, analysts, writers, all use numbers to justify their arguments in determining a players value. Numbers are an inescapable part of our baseball lives in our every day efforts to explain outcomes that sometimes just can’t be explained.
But what about those things in baseball that can’t be measured? What about the so called intangibles? Things like mound presence, leadership, and in the case of a catcher, the ability to control a pitchers staff. How in fact do we measure the immeasurable? How do we give credit to a player who takes out a shortstop to avoid a double play, that eventually leads to Miguel Cabrera getting an at bat that wins the game?
As precious as numbers are to baseball, they don’t always tell the whole story, especially about catchers. Catchers effect baseball games in more subtle ways than anyone on the diamond. They are involved in every pitch defensively, as well as getting time on the offensive side of things. This, the offensive side, is often where fans and analysts spend much of their focus, because numbers are tangible. We can see them, analyze them, and measure them.
But do numbers matter when it comes to a catcher? How do we go about judging the effectiveness of a player like Alex Avila? Is it about ERA?
Well, I don’t exactly think that is the complete answer, though I do believe ERA shows a comfort level between the pitchers and catcher when there is discrepancy between the starter and the back up.
Ultimately, the game of baseball boils down to wins and losses. That’s what teams are judged on. It is about whether or not teams win the big prize of taking home a World Series title.
Let me do some background here before I get to my end.
Tigers catcher Alex Avila has been under a tremendous amount of fire from Tigers fans this year. At least until recently when his second half offensive surge has begun to get Avila out of Tigers fans’ doghouse. It is no surprise that offense has been the catalyst to the fans beginning to respect Avila once again. After all, in 2011, Avila was one of, if not the best offensive catcher in the game for a year. He likely played at a level above what he is capable of in 2011, but still, the drop off in the past two years offensively has been immense. Every major offensive statistic has seen a drastic drop, and ultimately has affected his overall value.
Despite Avila’s recent offensive surge, .273 batting average in the second half with an OPS of .831, his overall line is still atrocious at a .198 batting average and an OPS of .628. Couple that with back up Brayan Pena‘s really good offensive season, and you get a lot of fans suggesting that Brayan Pena should receive more time, or maybe even share time with Avila.
That assertion seems completely fair, especially considering when all of the numbers would support such a theory. Pena’s offensive output this season has completely dwarfed Avila’s. Pena in contrast to Avila is hitting .306 this season with an OPS of .753. Pena’s wOBA average would be 7th in all of baseball ahead of respected guys like Matt Wieters and Salvador Perez. His fWAR is 0.5 on the season. Avila’s is zero. Baseball reference is a bit nicer to Avila, his WAR is 0.1 on that site, while Pena once again tops Avila with 0.2 bWAR.
In the case of Alex Avila, the numbers couldn’t be more wrong. His contribution to the Tigers clearly can’t be seen in numbers. It can be seen in the Tigers win/loss record. Overall on the season, the Tigers stand atop the American League Central with a 70-49 record. The Tigers record when Alex Avila doesn’t start the game? It is 23-25. It is 47-24 when he does.
Now, that is a number I can get behind.
We bend numbers every which way in an effort to find out truths about performance on the baseball diamond. And often, we accept them at face value. This isn’t an attack on WAR, or advanced metrics by any means. I often use them myself in articles, and evaluating the performance of players. But sometimes we have to step a take back and remember, baseball is a great game that is more than just numbers. Those intangibles? They really do matter. And they matter more at the catching position than anything else. How else can we explain a catcher who has less WAR, and far less offensive output, having a substantially better win/loss record?
We can’t, because baseball isn’t as simple as we want it to be…and some things just won’t be answered.
The Tigers head into a weekend series with the surging Kansas City Royals without their starting catcher, and make no mistake, despite Brayan Pena and his capability to fill in when needed (this is no knock on him), the Tigers are going to miss Alex Avila.
You know how I know? The wins and losses tell me so.
And in the end, isn’t that all that matters?