Dan Dickerson sends message to Tigers front office over Tarik Skubal trade rumors

And he didn't hold back.
Division Series - Detroit Tigers v Seattle Mariners - Game Five
Division Series - Detroit Tigers v Seattle Mariners - Game Five | Alika Jenner/GettyImages

Until Tarik Skubal is traded or re-signed, the questions surrounding his future will continue to dominate Detroit Tigers offseason chatter. The American League Cy Young finalist is set to become a free agent after the 2026 season, and the prevailing thought process already appears to be that the Tigers will try to trade him rather than give him the massive contract he is seeking in free agency.

Dan Dickerson, radio play-by-play voice of the Tigers, recently shared his thoughts on the matter on the "Days of Roar" podcast – and he didn't hold back.

"You want to win a World Series in 2026? You keep Tarik Skubal," Dickerson said. "You build around him. You've got young talent coming, as you said, and then you try to re-sign him. This is what good executives do. What's the number that he needs to get to? Figure out that number. Figure out creative ways that you can get to that number."

Dickerson’s comments about Skubal were far more than a broadcaster’s opinion. They were a pointed challenge to Detroit’s front office and ownership, a moment where the voice of the Tigers essentially drew a bright line between talking about contention and actually behaving like a contender. His words frame the Skubal situation as a referendum on Scott Harris’s competence, Chris Ilitch’s financial conviction, and the organization’s true intent to win in 2026.

Dan Dickerson puts pressure on Scott Harris, Chris Ilitch to extend Tarik Skubal

When Dickerson says, “This is what good executives do,” he’s defining the standard Harris must meet. Good executives identify franchise pillars early and extend them before cost escalation or free-agency risk, and Skubal is one of those pillars for the Tigers. For Harris, this becomes a proof-of-concept moment: can he handle both roster vision and long-term payroll design the way other successful front offices have?

If Harris trades Skubal for prospect depth, it would signal a lack of conviction in his own developmental core – effectively admitting he can’t win with the players he’s built around. Keeping and extending Skubal, by contrast, shows strategic clarity and a commitment to compete rather than perpetually rebuild.

When Dickerson says, “Figure out the number," he’s really talking to Ilitch. Those “creative ways” he's referring to include opt-outs, performance escalators or deferred money structures – all of which require ownership’s cooperation and financial flexibility.

This is why Dickerson’s statement bites. He’s not merely endorsing an extension; he’s implying that failure to pay Skubal will expose Ilitch’s cheapness disguised as prudence. Detroit fans have heard years of “we’re building sustainably” rhetoric; letting a Cy Young-caliber homegrown ace leave would confirm the worst fears — that payroll discipline matters more than winning windows.

Dickerson also frames the Skubal decision around a World Series clock. That timeline matters. It reflects the reality that the Tigers’ young core will all be in their prime by then. A Skubal trade would effectively restart that clock, signaling that contention is once again theoretical. Keeping him (and paying him) would send the opposite message that Detroit finally intends to finish a rebuild, rather than endlessly justify it.

Ultimately, Dickerson’s comments distilled what Tigers fans have felt for years – namely, that the Skubal decision is the franchise’s credibility test. If Harris extends him, it validates his front office acumen. If Ilitch funds it, it proves ownership actually wants to win. If they trade or lowball him, it confirms every lingering suspicion about Detroit’s cheapness and small-market mindset under Ilitch’s watch.

In short, Skubal isn’t just the ace of the Tigers’ rotation; he’s the measuring stick for whether this regime truly belongs among baseball’s serious contenders.

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations